Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Effective Paraphrasing Of Work-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: What is the most efficient way to correctly paraphrase the work of other writers, develop a concept map that makes a connection between the content words in the question, your existing understanding of the topic and the concepts to be explored through research. Answer: Developing a concept map Figure: Concept map (Source: Created by author) First article review The article focuses on the ways to add semantics in order to contribute to effective paraphrasing. Paraphrasing of works is done in order to avoid plagiarism and portray a sense of originality in the work (Fader, 2013). The article shows variations in the relationship between the semantics and the direct entailment of the concept. This article focuses on the different types of semantic relationships with the entailment words and the manner in which these words can be used in order to change the pattern of writing. It has been seen from this article that over 77 million pairs of semantics make it difficult for people to paraphrase a particular word. It is seen that on most occasions the form of writing need to be changed completely in order to ensure that repetition of words and similar sentences does not occur. The analysis done by the authors (Pavlick, 2015) suggested that bilingual features are important in order to distinguish class from a path. Certain features need to be analysed in order to understand the ways by which paraphrasing of work can be distributed. These features include lexical, distributional, paraphrasing, translation, path and WordNet. The analysis clearly shows that strong performance is shown from the application of lexical. This is mainly because of the fact that this form uses negation words that can be easily paraphrased. It also uses substring features that are also easier to paraphrase. Examples of such are given while writing "little boy" an individual can write "boy" in order to demonstrate the meaning of the word. Thus, the article helps to understand the concept of paraphrasing by analysing every word along with its syllables. This is useful in the case of paraphrasing complex writing into simpler sentences for the convenience of an individual. Second article review In the article, there are five simple rules that can help in paraphrasing work of an individual. Plagiarism is considered to be a form of (Ober, 2013). Writing using own words can help in enhancing the knowledge of an individual and remain creative. The fact that a paraphrased work is acceptable only if the words are new and fresh are analysed in the article. The article also states that citations need to be used whenever there is doubt to paraphrase a word or sentence. Avoiding the use of citations indicates that the paper may not be written in own words (Koeva, 2015). Hence, it is required for individuals to use quotation marks whenever there is a problem owing to writing fresh words for an article. The analysis of the paper shows that most of the works that are written in English may not have English as their second language. In this regard, it can be said that the use of these steps is mandatory in order to avoid plagiarism. The form used for hiding plagiarism includes patch writing that is blended with the original work of the author. Hence, it can be said that from the analysis of the article it can be said that the article provides valuable knowledge about the manner in which plagiarism can be avoided. The use of a smart method of paraphrasing can help in being creative in the field of writing. Bibliography Fader, A. Z. (2013). Paraphrase-driven learning for open question answering. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1608-1618. Ganitkevitch, J. V.-B. (2013). PPDB: The Paraphrase Database. In HLT-NAACL, 758-764. Koeva, S. (2015). Paraphrasing of Synonyms for a Fine-grained Data Representation. In SEMANTiCS, 79-83. Ober, H. S. (2013). Five simple rules to avoid plagiarism. Annals of biomedical engineering. 1-2. Pavlick, E. B.-B. (2015). Adding semantics to data-driven paraphrasing. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 1512-1522. Rogerson, A. M. (2017). Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.